Single in Your 20sTake the quiz

Single now

How do I set boundaries with someone new without losing them?

Say what you will do, not what they have to do, early and in a sentence or two. People react to a clear no far less badly than we expect, and if your last relationship ran on rules and checking, this is your chance to build something on boundaries instead.

Jump to a section
  1. What’s the difference between a boundary and a rule?
  2. Why does saying no feel like it’ll end things?
  3. What if I come across as too much?
  4. Won’t being direct make things awkward?
  5. When does a “boundary” turn into control?
  6. What to do tonight, and this week
  7. What doesn’t the research show?

You set a boundary with someone new by saying what you will do, not what they have to do, early and in a sentence or two. Most people react to a clear no far less badly than you fear, and if your last relationship ran on rules and checking, someone new is a clean chance to build on boundaries instead.

What’s the difference between a boundary and a rule?

A boundary is about you: what you’ll do, what you’ll say yes to, what you’ll walk away from. A rule is about them: what they’re allowed to do. “I don’t answer my phone after midnight” is a boundary. “Don’t text me after midnight” is a rule.

Tomás, 25, is an ER tech on rotating nights. Five weeks ago he met Noa, 24, at a pickup soccer game, and it’s going well. The problem is his schedule. After a run of nights he sleeps from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., and Noa, who works 9 to 5, has started sending good-morning voice notes that buzz him awake.

His last relationship had a lot of rules. His ex wanted his location on during shifts and got upset when he didn’t reply on breaks. By the end, everything was a rule in both directions, and nobody felt safe.

So Tomás’s first draft to Noa was “please don’t text me before 2.” His second was “after nights my phone’s on Do Not Disturb till 2, so don’t worry if I’m quiet.” Same sleep. Very different message. The first asks Noa to manage his schedule. The second just tells her what he’s doing.

Why does saying no feel like it’ll end things?

Because you’re predicting the other person’s reaction, and people are bad at that. In a pilot study by Julian Givi and Colleen Kirk, 77% of people admitted they’d accepted an invitation to something they didn’t want to do because they were worried about what would happen if they declined.1 Then, across five experiments with more than 2,000 participants, the people doing the inviting turned out much more understanding, and less upset, angry or sad, than the people saying no expected.1

Those were invitations from friends and acquaintances, not a new person you’re into. But the gap is the same one Tomás is staring at: the disappointment in his head is much bigger than the one Noa is likely to feel.

What if I come across as too much?

You probably feel pushier than you look. Daniel Ames and Abbie Wazlawek found what they call a “line crossing illusion”: in negotiations, many people believed they’d been too assertive when the other person actually saw them as about right.2 Most of their participants were MBA students negotiating deals, so it’s not a dating study.2 Still, if you’ve rehearsed a two-sentence boundary eleven times and it feels aggressive, that’s worth knowing.

Separate the pieces before you hit send:

  • What happened: Noa sent a voice note at 9:40 a.m. Tomás woke up.
  • The reading: “If I say anything, she’ll think I’m cold or not into her.”
  • The fear: “She’ll pull back, and I’ll be explaining my schedule to the next person too.”
  • The next step: Turn on Do Not Disturb, send one heads-up, and see how she answers.

Won’t being direct make things awkward?

For a minute, maybe. In a study of 61 couples filmed while trying to get each other to change something, Nickola Overall and colleagues found that direct requests felt less successful in the moment, but predicted more actual change over the next year.3 The softer, indirect approach felt better right away but didn’t predict change later on.3 Those were established couples, not five weeks in, but the trade-off translates: a little awkwardness now buys you less resentment later.

Hinting is often how people pleasing sneaks into boundaries. You mention you’re “so tired lately” and hope they connect it to the voice notes. They don’t. You get more tired.

When does a “boundary” turn into control?

When it’s really a rule about their phone, their friends or where they are. Checking has become normal enough that it barely registers. In research by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, 18.6% of 18 to 24-year-olds agreed it was reasonable to expect to track a partner’s location whenever they wanted, compared with 13.6% of participants overall.4 Most young people in the focus groups read tracking as a sign of care and trust, and the researchers flagged that expectation as a route into controlling behavior.4 It often starts as “I just need to know you’re safe.”

That’s why this distinction matters most after a relationship that had a lot of checking in it. If you were tracked, you might be tempted to track. If you tracked, you might know exactly how it starts.

And if you set a boundary and someone new reacts with anger, threats, guilt trips or keeps checking up on you, that is not a wording problem. A person who punishes your boundaries is a safety concern, not a communication problem.

What to do tonight, and this week

  • Tonight, write the rule you’ve been tempted to send. Then rewrite it starting with “I.” If it can’t be rewritten, it was probably a rule.
  • Do the boundary before you announce it. Turn on Do Not Disturb, leave at 11, skip the sleepover. Then give a one-line heads-up.
  • Keep it to two sentences. What you’re doing, and one warm line (“I’m not ignoring you, I’m asleep”).
  • Attach a yes. A boundary next to a plan (“Thursday after my shift?”) is much easier to hear.
  • Watch the response, not your reading of it. “Oh good to know!” is an answer. So is sulking for three days.

If saying no to anyone sets off days of anxiety, or you keep ending up in relationships where your needs get negotiated away, a licensed mental-health professional can help you work on it. That’s common, not a flaw.

What doesn’t the research show?

  • The saying-no experiments were about social invitations, not dating, and the participants weren’t romantically involved.1
  • The line-crossing work used negotiations, mostly among MBA students, not conversations with someone new.2
  • The communication study followed established couples, and directness worked over months, not instantly.3
  • The tracking research was done in Australia and measured attitudes, not behavior. It doesn’t mean everyone who shares a location is controlling.4
  • No study can promise someone stays after you set a boundary. They show that the fear of saying it tends to be bigger than the reaction.

Try it

Boundary or rule for them? Sort what you'd say to someone new

  1. 1/6 After night shifts, my phone's on Do Not Disturb until 2 p.m.

    Boundary. This is about what you do with your phone. They can text whenever they like. You'll just answer later.

  2. 2/6 Don't text me while I'm sleeping.

    Rule for them. This one manages their behavior, and you can't enforce it anyway. The Do Not Disturb version gets you the same sleep.

  3. 3/6 I don't do sleepovers the night before a shift.

    Boundary. It's your choice about your night. Nobody else has to change anything for it to work.

  4. 4/6 Share your location so I don't have to worry.

    Rule for them. That's checking, not a boundary. The worry is real, but it's yours to handle, not theirs to fix by being tracked.

  5. 5/6 If plans keep moving last minute, I'll stop holding Saturdays open.

    Boundary. You're saying what you'll do with your time. It's a consequence for you, not a punishment for them.

  6. 6/6 You can't follow your ex anymore if we're doing this.

    Rule for them. That's a rule about their life. If exes matter to you, the boundary is saying so early and deciding what you'll do with the answer.

0 to 2 right

Rules are doing the boundary's job

Lots of us learned that the way to feel safe is to manage the other person. It rarely works, and it can turn into checking. Try rewriting one rule as 'I will' instead of 'you can't.'

3 to 4 right

You've got the instinct

You can spot a boundary, but a rule or two still sounds reasonable when you're worried. Notice which ones: they usually point at the old alarm from the last relationship.

5 to 6 right

Clear on the line

You know a boundary is something you do. The harder part is saying it out loud with someone new before you need it. Pick the one you've been putting off.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the date you loved but still can't quite figure out.See your pattern

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • Before it becomes a thing

    Heads-up so you don't read into it: after night shifts my phone's on Do Not Disturb till about 2. I'm not ignoring you, I'm unconscious. I'll text when I'm up.

  • To say no and keep the plan

    I can't do a late one tonight, I'm on at 7. But I'd really like to see you. Thursday after my shift, 4ish?

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Bella DePaulo

Research and writing on single life, including people who choose to stay single and live full lives on their own terms.

Social psychologist (PhD, Harvard); academic affiliate, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, UC Santa Barbara · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Marisa G. Franco

Friendship, loneliness and belonging, and how adults make and keep close friends.

Licensed counseling psychologist; PhD in Counseling Psychology, University of Maryland, where she teaches · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Nedra Glover Tawwab

Boundaries in relationships, family and friendship, and how to say what you need.

Licensed therapist; founder of Kaleidoscope Counseling · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 7 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Saying No: The Negative Ramifications From Invitation Declines Are Less Severe Than We ThinkScienceDaily (reporting Givi and Kirk, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology), 2023Used for: In a pilot study, 77% of respondents said they had accepted an invitation to something they didn't want to attend because they worried about the consequences of declining; across five experiments with more than 2,000 participants, people who extended invitations were more understanding and less upset, angry or sad about a decline than the people declining expected.
  2. Pushing in the Dark: Causes and Consequences of Limited Self-Awareness for Interpersonal AssertivenessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Ames and Wazlawek), 2014Used for: Across four studies (three with MBA students in negotiation courses, one an online survey of 500 U.S. adults), many people showed a 'line crossing illusion': they believed they had come across as too assertive when their counterparts saw them as appropriately assertive.
  3. Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategiesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (Overall, Fletcher, Simpson and Sibley), 2009Used for: In 61 couples videotaped while trying to change something about each other, direct strategies were initially seen as relatively unsuccessful but predicted more change over the next 12 months, while positive-indirect strategies felt more successful in the moment but did not predict later change.
  4. Youth support for tracking apps raises red flag for coercive controleSafety Commissioner (Australian Government)Used for: In eSafety Commissioner research, 13.6% of all participants agreed it was reasonable to expect to track an intimate partner whenever they wanted with location-sharing apps, rising to 18.6% of 18 to 24-year-olds; every young person in the focus groups used location sharing in their own relationships or knew someone who did, and most read partner tracking as care and trust, which can feed tech-based coercive control.
Up nextHow do I stop people pleasing when I start dating someone?