Single in Your 20sTake the quiz

Single now

How do I stop being afraid of abandonment?

Not by finding someone who never leaves, but by slowly collecting evidence that people can stay and that you'll be okay if they don't. Single in your 20s, after a breakup, you have an unusually good window for it: your friendships, your last relationship and, if you want it, therapy are all things you can work with now.

Jump to a section
  1. Where does the fear come from?
  2. Isn’t it just about who you date?
  3. Can friends actually help with this?
  4. Can the fear really change, or is this just who you are?
  5. Is therapy worth it if you’re not in a relationship?
  6. What to do this month
  7. What doesn’t the research show?

You stop being afraid of abandonment slowly, by giving the fear new evidence: people who stay, moments where you reach out and someone answers, and proof that you can get through it when someone doesn’t. Being single in your 20s, between relationships, is actually a good time to do that, because you can work on it without a new person’s every move setting off the alarm.

Where does the fear come from?

Usually from experience. Somewhere along the way, closeness and losing it got linked: a parent who was there and then wasn’t, a friend group that dropped you, a first serious relationship that ended without warning. The fear is your mind’s attempt to never be caught off guard again. It isn’t a character flaw. It’s a lesson that was learned too well.

Take Jules, 26. Four months ago her three-year relationship ended, and now that the worst of the grief has passed, she’s noticing something uncomfortable. In the last year with her ex, she checked in constantly, rearranged her plans around his, and went quiet and agreeable whenever he seemed distant. She also did a version of that in the relationship before. Different guy, same Jules.

That’s worth taking seriously, because patterns tend to travel. Using a large German survey, Matthew Johnson and Franz Neyer compared 554 people’s first and second relationships once each had settled in.1 On satisfaction, conflict and how stable the relationship felt, the new relationship looked a lot like the old one, and only two things differed: more sex and more admiration from the new partner.1 A new person doesn’t automatically bring a new pattern. What you bring with you does a lot of the work.

Isn’t it just about who you date?

Partly. Choosing people who are consistent matters a lot. But if the plan is only “find someone who won’t leave,” the fear stays in charge of the search, and it tends to read every slow week as proof.

There’s also some evidence that how hard breakups land is partly a stable tendency. Shmuel Shulman and colleagues followed 124 young adults in Israel from age 20 to 28.2 About two-thirds had consistently low distress after breakups across those years, and about one-third had consistently high distress.2 The people on the low track tended to show skills for handling their relationships competently.2 That doesn’t sort anyone into a box forever. It does suggest that if every ending flattens you, the useful work may be in skills and patterns you carry, not just in the next person.

Can friends actually help with this?

Yes, and this is the part people underrate. In a study of young adults in Italy, friends were a big part of people’s attachment networks, the people they turned to for comfort and to feel close, while parents often stayed the steady base in the background and romantic partners became more central over time.3 The researchers described young adulthood as a period of intense reshuffling of who those people are.3

That reshuffling is your opening. Every time Jules texts her friend Anika “bad night, can I call?” and Anika picks up, the fear gets a data point it didn’t predict. Every time Anika is busy, says so, and calls the next day, it gets another one: people can be unavailable without leaving.

Can the fear really change, or is this just who you are?

It can shift. In one study, psychologists Carnelley and Rowe used brief exercises designed to activate a sense of attachment security, repeating them on three occasions over three days.4 Two days later, without any reminder, those people reported less attachment anxiety, more positive views of themselves and more hopeful expectations of relationships than at the start, while a comparison group showed no change.4

That was a short lab study, not a cure. But it fits the bigger idea here: security builds through repetition. Not one big revelation, but lots of small moments where being close went okay.

Is therapy worth it if you’re not in a relationship?

Often this is the ideal time. A meta-analysis by Kenneth Levy and colleagues pulled together 36 studies with 3,158 patients.5 People who were more securely attached tended to do better in therapy, and improvements in attachment security during therapy may go along with better outcomes overall.5 For people starting out less secure, therapy that focuses on relationships and how you interact with others may be a particularly good fit.5

You don’t need a crisis to go. “I want to understand why endings hit me this hard before I date again” is a perfectly good first sentence. And if the fear is intense, constant, or getting in the way of your sleep, work or friendships, a licensed mental-health professional is the right help, not something to push through alone.

What to do this month

  • Write the last-relationship timeline. What happened in the final few months, and what did you do each time you felt them pull back? One line per moment.
  • Name your move. Chasing, shrinking, going cold, leaving first. Most people have one favorite. Knowing yours is half the work.
  • Pick two steady people. Friends, a sibling, a cousin. Reach out to them on purpose when you’re low, and notice when they show up.
  • Let small disappointments happen. A friend who cancels and reschedules is evidence too. Track the reschedule, not just the cancel.
  • Look into therapy if the fear has followed you through more than one relationship. Ask specifically about working on attachment and relationship patterns.

What doesn’t the research show?

  • The relationship-pattern study compared settled phases of two relationships in one country’s survey. It shows dynamics often carry over, not that yours will.1
  • The breakup-distress study followed a small group in Israel and describes tendencies, not fixed types.2
  • The attachment-network study was of Italian young adults and describes who people turn to, not whether friends reduce fear of abandonment directly.3
  • The security-priming study was short and lab-based. Its effects lasted days, not years.4
  • The therapy meta-analysis is about patients in treatment, and it links security and outcomes without proving one causes the other.5

Try it

Builds security or feeds the fear? Sort what you might do this month

  1. 1/6 You text a friend 'rough day, can I call?' and actually call.

    Builds security. Reaching for someone steady and having them show up is exactly the kind of evidence the fear needs to see. Small, repeated, real.

  2. 2/6 You stay home on Friday so no one can cancel on you.

    Feeds the fear. It feels protective, but it means the fear never gets tested. You skip the hurt and also skip the proof that people do turn up.

  3. 3/6 You write down how your last relationship ended and what you did in the final month.

    Builds security. Seeing your own moves on paper is how a pattern stops being invisible. You can't change a loop you can't describe.

  4. 4/6 You decide the next person just needs to be more reliable than your ex.

    Feeds the fear. Better choices matter, but if the whole plan is 'find someone who won't leave,' the fear stays in charge of the search.

  5. 5/6 You book a first appointment with a therapist to talk about how endings hit you.

    Builds security. If the fear is old or heavy, working on it with a licensed professional is one of the most direct routes there is.

  6. 6/6 You redownload the apps the week you feel lonely, to feel wanted fast.

    Feeds the fear. Dating is fine. Dating to quiet the fear tends to hand the fear the steering wheel. Notice which one this is.

0 to 2 right

The fear is doing the sorting

Some of the moves that feel safest are the ones that keep the fear strong. That's a very normal place to start, and it's useful to know which ones tempt you.

3 to 4 right

You can see the difference, mostly

You know what builds security in theory. The tricky ones are the moves that feel like self-protection or like moving on. Those are worth a second look.

5 to 6 right

You know what works

On paper, you sort these cleanly. The real test is doing the building moves on a lonely Tuesday, when the other kind is right there and feels so much better for an hour.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the dating patterns you keep seeing in yourself.See your pattern

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Bella DePaulo

Research and writing on single life, including people who choose to stay single and live full lives on their own terms.

Social psychologist (PhD, Harvard); academic affiliate, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, UC Santa Barbara · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Marisa G. Franco

Friendship, loneliness and belonging, and how adults make and keep close friends.

Licensed counseling psychologist; PhD in Counseling Psychology, University of Maryland, where she teaches · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Nedra Glover Tawwab

Boundaries in relationships, family and friendship, and how to say what you need.

Licensed therapist; founder of Kaleidoscope Counseling · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 7 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. New romantic relationships may end up following the same patterns as previous onesBritish Psychological Society Research Digest, reporting Johnson and Neyer in the Journal of Family Psychology, n.d.Used for: Matthew Johnson (University of Alberta) and Franz Neyer (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) analyzed 554 people in the German Family Panel who had two relationships recorded in the survey; comparing the most stable phases of the first and second relationships, there were no significant differences in relationship or sexual satisfaction, amount of conflict or perceived stability, and only two measures differed (more sex and more admiration from the partner in the second relationship).
  2. Breakup distress trajectories across emerging adulthood and the quality of romantic relationshipsBar-Ilan University research portal (Shulman and colleagues), n.d.Used for: Shmuel Shulman and colleagues followed 124 Israeli emerging adults at ages 20, 23, 25 and 28 and identified two breakup-distress trajectories: stable low distress (about two-thirds of the sample) and stable high distress (about one-third); people on the low trajectory showed skills to manage their relationships competently.
  3. Attachment networks in young adultsFrontiers in Psychology (via PubMed Central), n.d.Used for: In a study of Italian young adults, friends remained very important in attachment networks and were used mainly for safe haven and proximity-seeking functions, parents (especially mothers) stayed central for the secure-base function, and romantic partners gained relevance; young adults were described as going through an intensive restructuring of their attachment networks.
  4. Repeated priming of attachment security influences immediate and later views of self and relationshipsPersonal Relationships (University of Southampton repository, Carnelley and Rowe), 2007Used for: Participants primed with attachment security (or a neutral prime) on three occasions across three days, then measured two days later without a prime: those repeatedly primed with security reported more positive relationship expectations, more positive self-views and less attachment anxiety than at baseline, while the neutral group showed no change; the effects lasted longer than those typically found.
  5. Adult attachment as a predictor and moderator of psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Psychology (Levy, Kivity, Johnson and Gooch, via PubMed), 2018Used for: A meta-analysis of 36 studies (3,158 patients) found that patients with more secure attachment before treatment had better psychotherapy outcomes; improvements in attachment security during therapy may coincide with better outcomes; and people with low pretreatment security may do better in therapy that focuses on interpersonal interactions and close relationships.
Up nextWhy do I feel insecure as soon as I start dating someone?