Single in Your 20sTake the quiz

Dating when you want to

How do I trust someone again after being lied to?

You don't decide to trust again. You let it build from small things a new person says and then actually does. In your 20s, when the person who lied may have been one of your first serious relationships, the work is making sure the next person isn't paying for what the last one did.

Jump to a section
  1. Why does one liar make everyone look suspicious?
  2. Is everyone just lying, though?
  3. How do you tell caution from carrying it?
  4. Can a new relationship actually undo this?
  5. What should you do this week?
  6. What doesn’t the research show?

You don’t trust someone new by deciding to. You let trust build out of small things they say and then actually do, while you keep checking whether your caution is about them or about the last person. One lie from one person is real information about that person. It isn’t a forecast for everyone you’ll date next.

Why does one liar make everyone look suspicious?

Picture Noor, 24. Her ex of two years told her he’d stopped talking to a coworker. He hadn’t. She found out from a screenshot a friend sent her, eight months after he’d sworn it was over. Now she’s on a third date with someone who says he’s “bad at texting during the week,” and her brain is already running the math on what that really means.

That reaction makes sense once you see what a lie actually breaks. In a classic 1985 paper, psychologists John Rempel, John Holmes and Mark Zanna described trust in close relationships as having three parts. Predictability: can I anticipate what this person will do? Dependability: are they someone I can count on when it matters? Faith: do I feel confident about where this is going, even without proof?1 A lie damages all three, but it hits faith hardest, because faith was the part you weren’t checking.

There’s lab evidence that deception is its own kind of damage. In experiments at the Wharton School, Maurice Schweitzer, John Hershey and Eric Bradlow had people play a money game with a partner who behaved badly. When the bad behavior came without a lie, a steady run of trustworthy actions restored trust. When it came with a lie, trust never fully recovered, even after a promise, an apology and consistently good behavior afterward.2 Those were strangers in a game, not exes. But it matches how being lied to often feels: it doesn’t just lower your trust in one person, it makes trusting at all feel naive.

Is everyone just lying, though?

Mostly, no. In a 2010 survey of 1,000 U.S. adults, communication researchers Kim Serota, Timothy Levine and Franklin Boster found that 60% reported telling no lies at all in the previous 24 hours, and almost half of all the lies reported came from just 5% of people.3 Self-reports have obvious limits, since people may not admit every lie. Still, the pattern points somewhere useful: a lot of lying comes from a smaller group of people, not evenly from everyone you might meet.

The apps add their own wrinkle. In a study of 80 online daters, Catalina Toma, Jeffrey Hancock and Nicole Ellison measured people’s actual height, weight and age and compared them with their profiles. Small stretches were everywhere, but they were small: in most cases about half an inch of height or five to ten pounds of weight.4 That’s worth holding onto. A little profile polish is common and annoying. It is not the same thing as the kind of lie your ex told, and treating them as equal will wear you out before you ever get to know anyone.

How do you tell caution from carrying it?

It helps to pull apart four things that usually arrive tangled together. Take Noor’s date:

  • What happened: he said he’s bad at texting during the week. Then he replied Tuesday night with a long, funny message.
  • The reading: he’s hiding something on weeknights.
  • The fear: I’m going to miss it again, like last time.
  • The next step: keep seeing whether what he says and what he does match.

Only the first one is a fact. The reading was borrowed from the ex. The fear is real and deserves care, but it’s about Noor’s history, not this man’s behavior. The next step is the only part she can actually act on.

A quick test: if a friend described this exact detail about someone she’d just started seeing, would you call it suspicious, or would you call it a Tuesday? Healthy caution looks at this person’s behavior over time. Carried caution looks at the last person’s behavior and projects it onto whoever is sitting across from you.

Can a new relationship actually undo this?

It can help, slowly. In a 2018 review, Ximena Arriaga, Madoka Kumashiro, Jeffry Simpson and Nickola Overall laid out a model of how romantic relationships can make people more secure over time. One idea from it: anxious insecurity tends to ease in situations that build your own confidence, while avoidant insecurity tends to ease through good experiences of actually depending on someone.5 It’s a model drawn from existing research, not a guarantee. But it fits the bigger picture. Trust doesn’t come back from a pep talk. It comes back from repeated, ordinary experiences of someone being who they said they’d be.

That’s predictability and dependability, rebuilt one small proof at a time. Faith comes last. That’s not a flaw in you. It’s the order trust usually takes.

What should you do this week?

  • Say what happened, in one sentence, to yourself. “He lied about the coworker for eight months.” Not “everyone lies” and not “I’m an idiot for believing him.” Precision shrinks the fear.
  • Choose small, low-stakes checks. Did they show up when they said? Does the story about their job sound the same on date three as on date one? You’re noticing, not investigating.
  • Tell, don’t interrogate. You don’t owe anyone the full story on date two, but one honest sentence about why you’re careful can prevent a lot of misreading on both sides.
  • Catch yourself testing. Going quiet to see if they chase, or asking questions you already know the answer to, makes a new person pay a debt they don’t owe.
  • Let the lie belong to the liar. Someone who lied to you showed you something about themselves. It isn’t proof that your judgment is broken.

If the fear doesn’t ease, keeps you up at night, or has you avoiding dating altogether for months, a licensed mental-health professional is the right kind of help. Being lied to by someone close can hit hard, and you don’t have to sort it out alone.

What doesn’t the research show?

  • The Wharton experiments used a money game with strangers,2 so they show how deception affects trust in a lab, not how it plays out between exes or new partners.
  • The lying survey relies on self-reports,3 and people may undercount their own lies.
  • The online dating study checked height, weight and age,4 not lies about feelings, other partners or intentions.
  • The security model is a framework built from other studies,5 not a test of whether any particular new relationship will help you.

Try it

On a good date with someone new, what does your trust alarm do?

They mention one small detail and I start building a case

Evidence mode, switched on early

Your brain learned that missing a detail cost you, so now it collects them all. The trouble is that a case file built on date two is mostly made of the last person's behavior, not this one's.

Your next step: For the next two dates, write down only what they did, not what it might mean. Read it back a week later.

I'm relaxed until they're vague, then I spiral

Vagueness is your trigger

The lie you lived through probably hid inside a vague answer, so vague now feels like danger. Sometimes it is just a person being vague, and sometimes it isn't. One question usually tells you more than a night of guessing.

Your next step: Next time an answer feels fuzzy, ask one plain follow-up instead of filling the gap yourself.

I keep it fun and light so no one gets close enough

Safe, but sealed off

Keeping everyone at a distance means no one can lie to you about anything that matters. It also means no one gets the chance to be trustworthy. Trust comes back through small experiences of relying on someone, and you're skipping all of them.

Your next step: Let one person you like do one small thing for you this week, and notice whether they follow through.

Honestly, I trust too fast, like it never happened

Skipping the repair step

Diving straight back in can be a way of proving the lie didn't change you. But going fast doesn't leave room to see whether what someone says and what they do line up over time.

Your next step: Pick one thing you'll wait to share until you've seen them keep a few small promises.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the dating patterns you keep seeing in yourself.See your pattern

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • When you want to explain without the whole saga

    Small thing about me: my last relationship ended partly because I was lied to for a while, so I'm a little slower to settle in. It's not about you. If I ask a follow-up question sometimes, that's all it is.

  • When a plan changes and your brain starts writing a story

    Hey, no stress at all. I noticed the plan shifted and my brain jumped straight to a story, so I'd rather just ask. What's going on? I'd like to work with the real version.

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Bella DePaulo

Research and writing on single life, including people who choose to stay single and live full lives on their own terms.

Social psychologist (PhD, Harvard); academic affiliate, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, UC Santa Barbara · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Marisa G. Franco

Friendship, loneliness and belonging, and how adults make and keep close friends.

Licensed counseling psychologist; PhD in Counseling Psychology, University of Maryland, where she teaches · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Nedra Glover Tawwab

Boundaries in relationships, family and friendship, and how to say what you need.

Licensed therapist; founder of Kaleidoscope Counseling · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 7 people we point to →

Sources

  1. Trust in close relationshipsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association), scale hosted by York University, 1985Used for: Rempel, Holmes and Zanna describe trust in close relationships as having three components: predictability (consistency of a partner's specific behavior based on past experience), dependability (qualities of the partner that warrant confidence in the face of risk) and faith (confidence in the partner's caring in the face of an uncertain future).
  2. Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated TrustOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania), 2006Used for: In money-game experiments, trust harmed by untrustworthy actions was effectively restored after a consistent series of trustworthy actions, and a promise to change sped recovery. When the violation also involved deception, trust never fully recovered, even after a promise, an apology and a consistent series of trustworthy actions.
  3. The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported LiesHuman Communication Research (Oakland University), 2010Used for: In a survey of 1,000 U.S. adults about lies told in the previous 24 hours, 60% reported telling no lies at all, and almost half of all reported lies were told by 5% of respondents.
  4. Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating ProfilesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Stanford Social Media Lab), 2008Used for: 80 online daters' measured height, weight and age were compared with their profiles. Deviations were ubiquitous but small in magnitude: in most cases height was rounded up by about half an inch and weight rounded down by five to ten pounds.
  5. Revising working models across time: Relationship situations that enhance attachment securityPersonality and Social Psychology Review (Goldsmiths, University of London), 2018Used for: Arriaga, Kumashiro, Simpson and Overall propose a model of how romantic relationships can promote lasting attachment security: attachment anxiety should decline most in situations that build personal confidence, and attachment avoidance should decline most in situations involving positive dependence on a partner.
Up nextHow do you know when it's time to break up?